newYou can listen to Fox's news articles!
In the first month of the presidency, Democrats launched a true snowstorm of lawsuits against Donald Trump and his new administration.
My number has so far brought a staggering 92 civil cases in various courts. Certainly there are many more.
Many include Trump's executive orders on immigration policy, personnel decisions, the dismantling of unnecessary institutions, and efforts by Government Efficiency (DOGE) to identify and eliminate government waste, fraud and abuse.
Many media outlets who dislike Trump have accused him of plunging the nation into a “constitutional crisis.” (Getty Images)
These cases have one thing in common. They are trying to take the chief executive from his core responsibility of directing employees and administrative departments within the government's administrative department. The obvious goal is to debilitate Trump politically.
I was a White House lawyer and I found a way around the obstacles to Trump's left law
After losing the election, Democrats now want to negate the outcome by rendering the winners helpless and helpless. As expected, they ran to federal court to obtain a restraining order and injunction.
Like young people whining about their report cards, they beg the judge to intervene.
Previous judicial results are mixed. Trump has achieved several important victories and has experienced several set-offs. But that was expected. It's still too early. The lower courts do not make permanent decisions. The US Supreme Court justice does that. They are the last arbitrators of the law and the guardians of our rights.
They act as sentinels who stand in a thorough manner over our constitution.
Marburyv. Interpreting the meaning of its respected document, as explained in Madison's Landmark 1803, is the main role of the highest court. The Supreme Court defines the parameters of power. What the President and Congress can and cannot do within the scope of the Constitution.
Under Article 2-1, the President is granted extensive authority to oversee and manage the administrative department. It is their “vested interests.” This includes making decisions regarding how different sectors are allocated, employment and shooting, and account and spending audits.
The most innovative month of modern presidents
The power of laws passed by Congress gives Trump the power to delegate those duties or powers. He did so through a signed executive order. This is a healthy stewardship born from common sense.
Many media outlets who dislike Trump have accused him of plunging the nation into a “constitutional crisis.” The Benighted Pundit class claims he is shredding the constitution. As always, their declarations have been overturned and no information is known.
In reality, Trump is doing exactly what a responsible president has to do within our constitutional structure. He serves the interests of the masses. That is his strict obligation. He acts in a financially wise manner, ensuring that your taxes are spent wisely and effectively.
This means that we will no longer waste taxpayer money on divisive DEI policies with progressive slash funds that drink subsidies to left-wing allies, such as divisive DEI policies, counter-effective energy schemes, luxurious foreign spending, and left-wing ideological gift bags. The list is long.
This was Trump's mission, so we won't forget. He ended a bloated, translocated administrative state, and unelected career bureaucrats held no responsibility to anyone. He vowed to clean his home, reduce the swelling workforce, and enact budget integrity, restraint and fiscal correctness.
Radical transparency is the secret to Trump's early success
Already, the tragedy of mistake payments and financial excesses have been exposed for all to see. With incredible transparency, Doge has discovered hundreds of millions of dollars in “war on waste.” So far, the public has practically appreciated it.
Despite liberal media criticism, a recent Harvard Cap/Harris poll shows that most citizens support a significant reduction in both the size of the government and its abundant spending. A surprising 70% believe that “government spending is filled with waste, fraud and inefficiency,” while 77% truly support what Doge is doing.
Democrats are shaking their financial sanity while Americans cheer for Trump's successful cost-cutting. Are they in favor of calming your hard-earned dollars? That's what they think in favor of the reckless status quo due to their lawsuit against the Doge audit.
How about this? The answer is very simple.
Without thinking, Democrats reflexively attack what Trump does, even if it makes perfect sense. Stealing pages against him from the previous vindictive law crusades, they fight back with more lawsuits. Logic and reason escape them.
The Supreme Court must defeat the jewels on an activist judge hamstrings President Trump
Meanwhile, they have forgotten public opinion. The aforementioned Harvard/Harris poll found that Democrats received just 36% approval ratings. This is largely due to 66% who want to “participate in the government's mission to reduce waste” led by Trump.
God forbids the party that once stood for a decentralized government with limited power may return to its wise roots. Instead, the so-called “Party of People” ignores people.
For decades, administrative states have grown exponentially, often expanding their power over the American people, and arming them. Democrats who played instrumental role in creating this unruly fourth part of the government now have a vested interest in its permanence.
As a result, American bureaucracy has transformed into a giant that our founders could never imagine. They will be mourned with an unconstitutional, abusive complexion.
With national debts of over $36 trillion, it's time for the president to control the illicit bureaucracy and put the government in the Ozempic diet. Too many employees are too few. Some jobs are redundant, if not unnecessary. You can save billions of dollars by trimming them along with your budget.
Trump, Ag Bondi how to persuade Democrats to abandon the law
Our constitutional framers deliberately devised a system of government with “active” chief executives who act in the best interests of the people and ensure their privileges. “Energy energy is a major character in the definition of good government,” writes Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 70.
Conversely, he reasoned that weak executives always produce bad governments.
We have witnessed many bad governments in the hands of besieged presidents over the past four years. His successor is now striving to turn the national ship to the right with course modifications requested by voters. The wishes of “our people” should not be ignored. But that's exactly what the Democrats do.
Again, Hamilton provides an intuitive explanation. “Men are often planned simply because there is no agency to plan it, or because they were planned by people they didn't like.” The unfortunate outcome is that “the great interest in society is sacrificed to vanity, conceit and individual stubbornness.”
President Trump is vigorously and appropriately using the power given to him by the Constitution.
For more information about Fox News, click here
A district court judge who denied his authority over the administrative body may find a judgment rejected by the Supreme Court. Finally. why? Because it is not the role of judges to order policy decisions or to submit political orders that follow their own partisan beliefs.
It's far from the “constitutional crisis” that Trump critics have, and this is how our government is supposed to operate in the Constitutional Republic. Supremes serve as the ultimate backstop.
When a judge misinterprets the law and communicates such cases with false decisions, particularly the decision-makers in which the president was involved – such cases tend to go through the appeal process and build up mercilessly the land in the national Supreme Court for a final decision.
Click here to get the Fox News app
Democrats may avoid making them believe that their early victories are uncontroversial or otherwise permanent. They're wrong.
As he fights to restore constitutional order, Trump is on his side with jurisprudence regarding executive functions.
For more information about Gregg Jarrett, click here
